Six 24-hour Days: Fact or Fiction?

by Erik Martin

Thesis: God created the earth in six literal twenty-four hour days approximately six to ten thousand years ago.

While this has been the historic position of Christ-followers, a traditional understanding of creation is now unpopular. Let’s look and see if the Bible really teaches a quickly-completed and recent creation. Has the church misunderstood God’s intention? What does the Bible really say?

1. Genesis 1:1

The most compelling support for a recent formation of the earth is Genesis chapter one. The opening verse of the Bible unequivocally declares, “God created the heavens and the earth” (Gen.1:1). In Genesis 1-2 the declared Creator explains how He accomplished this feat.

The Biblical text uses plain time markers understandable even to uneducated men to indicate the timeframe and chronology of God’s creation. Jews calculate their days from sundown until the following sundown. Genesis 1:3 speaks of the first creation day having an evening and then a morning. This linguistic structure links the days of Genesis 1 to Judaism’s common method of marking days. The length of a day when Genesis was composed, around 1450 B.C., is therefore comparable to the length of a day at the Beginning–even before the sun was born. Consequently, the original audience of the first book of Moses, Israel in the wilderness, would easily have understood that the creation was fully accomplished in six normal days.

An unbiased and straightforward reading of the first chapter of Genesis requires a quickly finished creation. Furthermore, God does not have a speech impediment; He is not a poor communicator. If He intended us to believe in an old earth, He could have easily explained His creative acts in a way that unambiguously recognized millions of years of creative processes.

2. Biblical Genealogies

Next, the biblical genealogies testify to a recent genesis. A few generations may be missing from the accounts, but any significant gaps or omissions would undermine the genealogies’ authenticity and accuracy. If the written records are missing scores of generations, how could descendants, hundreds, let alone thousands of years later have any hope of identifying and verifying their ancestors?

Furthermore, the clear and careful record of each man’s length of life and the age he became a father indicates that the text is meant to be and is an accurate historical document. The original audience of Genesis, Israel in the wilderness, could have easily traced back their genealogies using those recorded in the Pentateuch.

God seems to have expected His people to study His Word this closely. Why else did He include so many genealogical tables? The Israelites’ calculations would have easily established a very young age for the earth. Even more, if God wanted His covenant children to believe the universe was billions of years old, He could have easily told them. He would have included longer genealogies and noted any major gaps.

3. The Sabbath Day

God grounds the Jewish sabbath day–after six work-days–in His own past action. Israel was given one rest-day after six work-days because God worked the same way (Exodus 20:8-11). This parallel becomes absurd if each Creation day was more than 24-hours or if major gaps separated each day.

4. Beliefs of the Biblical Authors 

Thirdly, a recent creation was assumed, embraced, and taught by the biblical writers. The Psalmist testifies that God merely spoke and creation was accomplished (Psalm 33:6, 9). When Malachi references Genesis He endorses the teaching of Genesis (Malachi 2:10).

The Apostle Paul cites Adam’s fall in Romans 5:12-21. Paul treats Adam as a historical man and the biological father of all mankind. Furthermore, Paul constructs his entire Hamartiology upon the historicity of Adam. If Paul had known the Genesis account to be mistaken, He ought to have clarified any confusion. If Paul was mistaken about creation then he might also be mistaken about the sin, judgment and righteousness he teaches.

Paul is not alone in linking the present problem of sin with Adam’s transgression; He is merely echoing the prophets (Isaiah 43:27; Hosea 6:7). The Epistles scathingly condemn false teachers and work to correct their errant beliefs (Romans 16:17-18; 2 Corinthians 11:13-15; Galatians 1:6-9; Titus 1:10-16; Jude 1:4; 1 John 4:1). If God knew reality to contradict common Jewish thought, He would have clarified through one of His prophets or apostles.

Part 2: https://modernpuritan.com/2014/03/15/what-happened-2/

Stop Patronizing Women, Offer Support and the Truth

Recently a Texas judge upheld a law that requires a woman to be shown an ultrasound before obtaining an abortion. His decision was discussed on The View and Joyce Behar and Barbara Walters made the following stunning statements:

Joyce Behar: “It’s very totalitarian in my opinion. I mean, it smacks of forcing somebody to confront something that they have already decided they don’t want to deal with.”

So if a person doesn’t want to deal with something (in this case, someone), you just avoid it? Can you imagine applying this principle to other situations in your life? “I don’t want to deal with the fact that my daughter has been molested, so I’ll just ignore it.” “I don’t want to deal with my child being bullied at school, so I’ll just ignore it.” Countless people suffer tremendously because they don’t deal with the truth but disregard it.  Ignorance is not bliss. Proverbs 14:8 says, “The wisdom of the prudent is to give thought to their ways, but the folly of fools is deception.” It is very disrespectful to women to withhold truth from them. They need to know facts and see their unborn baby before they make a decision that will affect them for the rest of their lives. Women need support, not abortion.

Barbara Walters: “I think that in order to even think about having an abortion, to give up a child that is obviously unwanted, that’s why you’re doing it, it is such a tremendous decision, it’s involved with so much fear of what you’re doing, and guilt. 

Then to have to go and be forced to hear, to see the fetus, to hear the heartbeat, to put more guilt on you, I think is heartbreaking.”

So it’s all about how the woman feels, not about bringing harm to someone else? Notice her reference to “a child.” That’s no longer in question like it used to be. Now people admit it’s a child. They have to because it’s so clearly proven by the in utero technology we now have. But that doesn’t seem to matter. The message given on The View is that what really matters is what the woman wants. What selfishness! As a woman, I take great offense at these statements because they imply that what’s most important to a woman is how she feels, not what is true. “She shouldn’t be given all the facts, because that might make her feel guilty. After all, we must avoid guilt at all cost!” This undermines the strength of a woman and her ability to deal with what is true and to make wise choices in light of that truth.

And why is this such a “tremendous decision”? Why does it involve fear and guilt? Because this isn’t just another medical procedure like having your gall bladder removed. It involves another human being, a life that God ordained from the beginning of time. “For you created my inmost being, you knit me together in my mother’s womb” (Ps. 139:13).

Jesus said, “It is more blessed to give than to receive” (Acts 20:35). “Love your neighbor as yourself” (Matt. 22:39). It is always in the best interest of the woman to give life and to love another human being. That love might be expressed in the form of relinquishing her baby for adoption into a loving home or choosing to parent. But it will never be expressed by taking the life of her unborn child.

“Do not be wise in your own eyes; fear the Lord and shun evil. This will bring health to your body and nourishment to your bones” (Prov. 3:7).

 -Kathy Norquist, Executive Assistant to Randy Alcorn
http://www.epm.org/blog/2012/Mar/28/women-need-support-and-truth-not-abortion

Chosen to Salvation

“But we are bound to give thanks always to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth”  2 Thessalonians 2:13

“There are three things here which deserve special attention. First, the fact that we are expressly told that God’s elect are “chosen to salvation”: Language could not be more explicit. How summarily do these words dispose of the sophistries and equivocations of all who would make election refer to nothing but external privileges or rank in service! It is to “salvation” itself that God has chosen us. Second, we are warned here that election unto salvation does not disregard the use of appropriate means: salvation is reached through “sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth” It is not true that because God has chosen a certain one to salvation that he will be saved willy-nilly, whether he believes or not: nowhere do the Scriptures so represent it. The same God who “chose unto salvation”, decreed that His purpose should be realized through the work of the spirit and belief of the truth. Third, that God has chosen us unto salvation is a profound cause for fervent praise. Note how strongly the apostle express this – “we are bound to give thanks always to God for you. brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation”, etc. Instead of shrinking back in horror from the doctrine of predestination, the believer, when he sees this blessed truth as it is unfolded in the Word, discovers a ground for gratitude and thanksgiving such as nothing else affords, save the unspeakable gift of the Redeemer Himself.”

-A.W. Pink, Pamphlet: Chosen to Salvation
Complements of: http://networkedblogs.com/pE8C2

Beware the Teaching of Men

Jesus never promised your best life now. If this is your best life now then you have hell waiting you in the next life. Don’t be an idolator of the mind. Don’t create a Jesus in your mind who is loving but not holy, righteous, good and full of wrath. If Jesus came to preach love and prosperity in this life, He would never have been executed by the Jews through the Romans. Jesus did not live a prosperous life but died a death He did not deserve to pay for sin. He is not coming again with a pacifier in His mouth but as the Judge. His wrath will drench the hem of His robe in blood.

A true friend will lay down their life so that you may live. If you alter the gospel to make it appealing to this world, you do not love those to whom you are preaching. Do not be a blasphemer; do not trample under foot the blood of Christ; do not pervert the gospel. Preach God as He has revealed Himself in His word.  He has written His law on the hearts of all men and will hold all guilty who do not obey Christ. John 14:6 reads “Jesus said unto him, ‘I am the way, and the truth, and the life: no one comes to the Father, except through me.'”

http://showyou.com/v/y:hFLIZf7qiWM?u=philjohnson

Preach on Hell

“If you would ever be a healthy and scriptural Christian, I entreat you to beware of any ministry which does not plainly teach the reality and eternity of hell. Such a ministry may be soothing and pleasant, but it is far more likely to lull you to sleep than to lead you to Christ or build you up in the faith. It is impossible to leave out any portion of God’s truth without spoiling the whole. That preaching is sadly defective which dwells exclusively on the mercies of God and the joys of heaven and never sets forth the terrors of the Lord and the miseries of hell. It may be popular, but it is not scriptural; it may amuse and gratify, but it will not save. Give me the preaching which keeps back nothing that God has revealed.”

J.C. Ryle, Holiness: Its Nature, Hindrances, Difficulties, and Roots, “A Woman To Be Remembered”, [Moscow, ID: Charles Nolan Publishing, 2001], 212.

http://jcrylequotes.com/2011/08/23/preach-on-hell-because-it-is-scriptural/

 

Biblical and Compassionate Response to Gay Pride

“Perhaps worst of all is the knowledge that a rigorous critique of same-sex intercourse can have the unintended effect of bringing personal pain to homosexuals, some of whom are already prone to self-loathing. This is why it needs to be emphatically stated that to feel homosexual impulses does not make one a bad person.

I deplore attempts to demean the humanity of homosexuals. Whatever one thinks about the immorality of homosexual behavior, or about the obnoxiousness of elements within the homosexual lobby, homosexual impulses share with all other sinful impulses the feature of being an attack on the “I” or inner self experiencing the impulses (Romans 7:14-25). The person beset with homosexual temptation should evoke our concern, sympathy, help, and understanding, not our scorn or enmity.

Even more, such a person should kindle a feeling of solidarity in the hearts of all Christians, since we all struggle to properly manage our erotic passions. A homosexual impulse, while sinful, cannot take shape as accountable sin in a person’s life unless one acquiesces to it.

Thus a reasoned denunciation of homosexual behavior and all other attempts at nurturing and justifying homosexual passions is not, and should not be construed as, a denunciation of those victimized by homosexual urges, since the aim is to rescue the true self created in God’s image for a full life.”

Robert Gagnon, The Bible and Homosexual Practice, 31