Defending the Faith Requires Definitions

by J. Gresham Machen:

“Indeed nothing makes a man more unpopular in the controversies of the present day than an insistence upon definitions of terms. Men discourse eloquently today upon such subjects as God, religion, Christianity, atonement, redemption, and faith, but they are greatly incensed when they are asked to tell in simple language what they mean by these terms. You speak of Christ? What Christ? You speak of atonement? What atonement? What is the nature of the atonement? Faith? What kind of faith? What is the nature of the faith you speak of?”

by Kevin DeYoung:

“It can feel tedious at times, and perhaps some of our rigorous “definers” lack charity, but where would the church be without careful attention to precise language? How weak and impoverished would the faith be if we never bothered to define the Trinity, or justification, or inerrancy? And how much healthier will we leave the church if we carefully define terms like missional, social justice, and gospel? Liberalism grows where meanings are assumed and careful definitions are eschewed.”

One thought on “Defending the Faith Requires Definitions

  1. True, very true. Yet how often have I had people complain that I was being to picky by insisting that we carefully define terms. The lack of discernment among belivers is astounding, and even worse is the seeming hostility of people when you call attention to their lack of and need for discernment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s